Germanwings Airbus A 320 Flight 9525 was deliberately crashed by the Copilot March 24 | Andreas Lubuitz, 28, locked out the Pilot and set the autopilot to descend to 100 feet | Airline says it has no answer as to why the copilot did this criminal act, killing 149 others along with himself | But sounds from Cockpit Voice Recorder shows his breathing was stable, indicating he was calm during the descent | Screams from the passengers could be heard in the last minutes for whom death was instantaneous | The murdered passengers included 16 teenage school children and their two teachers returning home from Barcelona | French Public Prosecutor turns the accident inquiry into criminal investigation | Attempts on to collect every piece of the shattered aircraft | Lufthansa CEO Carsten Spohr declares the airline is "speechless" at the tragedy | Germanwings is a low cost subsidiary of Lufthansa, which has had the best safety record in the world | Indian Navy Dornier 228 crashes into Arabian Sea while on a night training sortie | One pilot survives and two, one of them a Lady officer, missing | Dassault delivers the first two upgraded Mirage 2000 to IAF | India begins countdown to launch its 4th Navigation Satellite | Indian Navy inducts three UAE-supplied ISV patrol boats | Indian Prime Minister to visit France and Germany early April |
  US 'pays-off' Pakistan to fight terrorism:
Congressmen skeptical
 
 
By Mahendra Ved Published : August 2007
 
     
New Delhi. Sceptical about the way Pakistan is using American money, US Congressmen have asked the Bush Administration to ensure that the money is used to fight terror and not to train guns at India.
 

American law-makers remain sceptical of the Bush administration's Pakistan policy. Congressman John Tierney urged the administration to ensure that the military support money went towards supplying equipment to fight terrorism, as opposed to bombers and submarines aimed at India.

But US Assistant Secretary of State Richard Boucher told a Congressional panel last month: "We do try to do both...help Pakistan with legitimate defensive needs, with its ability to patrol in the Arabian Sea," and finance equipment and reimburse expenses for the war on terror.

Whatever be President Pervez Musharraf's commitment to combat terrorism, that shows results every time the United States threatens to launch operations from the Pakistani territory, the fact is that Pakistan gets paid more than $ 100 million a month by the US.

The payment is specifically for the deployment of 80,000 Pakistani troops on its border with Afghanistan, ostensibly for the war on terrorism. The situation is no different from what prevailed in the 1980s, when Pakistan was the "frontline" state in the West's anti-Soviet campaign in Afghanistan.

It is not a mere coincidence that within a week of the US saying that it planned to launch its anti-terror operations from Pakistani territory that Pakistani forces closed in on Abdullah Mahsud who had crossed over from Afghanistan's Helmand province, choosing the Balochistan route to sneak into his home base in the tribal non-man land of South Waziristan.

Mahsud blew himself to avoid being captured on July 24.

It is obvious that the US uses the carrot-and-stick policy with Pakistan: using threats and pressures to get it to act against the terrorists, and then paying off the Pakistani forces to guard their own border with Afghanistan.

However, the Bush Administration has to justify both its actions before its own lawmakers.

The American money is meant to be "reimbursements" to Pakistan "for stationing troops and moving them around, and for gasoline, and bullets, and training and other costs that they incur as part of the war on terror," Boucher told a Congressional panel last month.

"That's a lot of money," He admitted before the panel about what amounts to a $ 1.2 billion per year reimbursement. "I don't know if it comes to the whole amount of their expenses, but we support their expenses, yes."

In all, US aid to Pakistan is now close to $ 2 billion a year, according to figures provided by Boucher, the top U S diplomat for South Asia.

Besides, the $ 1.2 billion reimbursements, Washington also gave Pakistan an addition $ 738 million in 2006 in assistance programs me, including $ 300 million in separate military aid.

The overall figure would put Pakistan on par with Israel and Egypt - with a higher component ($ 1.5 billion) in overall military assistance - of the top three recipients of US aid.

The Pakistan allocations are being met with deep misgivings and scepticism in the US Congress and strategic circles where there are growing demands on the Bush administration to tie aid for Islamabad's military to its performance and delivery in the war on terror.

"There are far more jihadists, extremist madrassas, Al Qaida operatives, Taliban safe havens and international terrorist training camps than Pakistani government officials are willing to admit. Is our current aid package, one in which we are providing at least 10 times more for military aid than for basic education assistance, in the best long-term interest of United States national security?" asked Congressman John Tierney, who chaired a hearing focused exclusively on the Pakistan question.

"And how do we in Congress justify to the American people writing checks for billions of dollars to a regime that may not be the partner against terrorism the United States needs it to be, but may actually be hurting national security interests of the United States and our allies?" added Congressman Christopher Shays, after some of his colleagues pointed out that Pakistan was host to the world's most wanted men like Osama bin Laden, nuclear proliferators AQ Khan, and even gangsters and terrorists.

Boucher maintained that the money was well spent and there was some accountability involved.

"Some of our money that we give Pakistan is reimbursements and so there is, you know, conditions that we pay for things," he said, later elaborating that "Pentagon is in charge of getting receipts and making sure they know how that money is being spent in the right places."

"If they didn't have the 85,000 troops in the border area, God knows what would be going on out there - not anything we could deal with ourselves, I'm sure," Boucher added.

 
  © India Strategic  
     
   
 
Top Stories
Defence Modernisation: Make in India and Private Sector
Reliance Infrastructure Acquires Pipavav Defence
HAL Marks Platinum Jubilee with New Initiaves
Air Chief Hopes for Early Rafale Contract
Apache and Chinook Helicopter Deal Likely Soon
Boeing Accelerates Engagement with India’s Aerospace Sector
India's LCA Naval Prototype - 2 takes off on maiden flight
India tests canisterised Agni-5 ICBM successfully
Hagel Welcomes New Defense Cooperation with India
Army Aviation: Growth and Modernisation Challenges
US Navy Approves F/A-18 Super Hornet IRST System for Production
Boeing Modernizes B-52 Bomber Weapons Bay Launcher
Indian Army Fast Tracking Modernisation, says Army Chief Gen Suhag
Boeing Completes World’s First All-Electric Propulsion Satellites
Indian Army: Modernisation and Current Status
India needs computer hardware industry to ensure security, says DRDO Chief
Indian Space Assets are worth $26 billion
Boeing-led Team Provides 10 Years of Missile Defense Protection
France announces order for Airbus A330 MRTT air-to-air refuelling aircraft
Airbus Defence and Space awarded 13 million Euro periscope maintenance facility for India
 
     
 Home | Contact Us| In the Press| Links| Downloads
© 2008-14, India Strategic. All rights reserved.